Home
HDTV Guides CRT TVs
LCD TV Guide
Plasma TV Guide
Flat-panel TV Reviews Plasma TV Reviews
LCD TV Reviews
Best HDTVs
Projection Systems Projection TV
RPTV Reviews
DIY Projection TV
Projector Reviews
Projection Screens
Digital and Satellite Television Digital TV Guide
Satellite Television
Sound and Wireless Systems Surround Sound
Wireless Speakers
Headphone Guide
Media Players
Home Theater Guides Home Theater Design
Equipment Racks
HT Cables
HDCP
Set-Up DVDs
Power Protection
Refurbished Products
Movie Posters MoviePoster Guide
The Poster Store
Books and Magazines Books & Magazines
Catalogs
Home Theater Ideas! HT Pictures Gallery
Home Theater Sites
Useful Links
Find the Best Price Price Search
Store HT Online Store
Website Information About Me
About Site Built It!
Website Content
Site Use & Dislaimer
Privacy Policy
Advertise on this Site
Site Search
Contact  Form
Site BLOG
E-zine Subscription
-

[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

 

left image



 

The New Samsung LED line vs Samsung LCD Tv's

by Laurence
(US)



It seems lately I have been bit by the "gotta have the newest" bug. The difference is I am trying to be an educated buyer and not just the "newest thing" buyer.

I have a question for you about all the newest features and how they relate to the best performance, latest technology, future technology etc. I am more interested in neat features like Internet,3D, future capabilities, picture quality etc.

Your article explains the LED vs LCD well, but what about 120hz vs 240hz refresh rate? I have the LED DLP 67A750 TV and am glad I bought it last year because I hated replacing bulbs and it did come 3D ready, which I look forward to trying even though I know the technology isn't quite there yet. Unknowing at the time, I have that 3D option because I bought the newest at the time.

I have questions on these options and what is a must have for buying todays newest LCD's: 120hz vs 240hz is the refresh rate really that noticeable? Could a higher refresh rate be used better for future uses like new 3D technologies with shutter glasses? 2/4/6 ms response time? Internet capabilities for upgrades, widgets, add-ons etc? Bezel back-lighting, gray or red? 25,000-1,000,000 response time? Input video signals? compatibility? and anything else being noted by manufacturers as must have.

Thank you, Laurence





Comments for
The New Samsung LED line vs Samsung LCD Tv's

Average Rating starstarstarstarstar

Click here to add your own comments

Oct 04, 2009
Rating
starstarstarstarstar
Getting the latest specs
by: Andrew Ghigo


Your valid questions require some lengthy answers! However, most of the topics raised are already discussed under the various articles that appear on the site. I suggest to search the site using the search box above for the respective discussions.


Just a few remarks though:

In your search for the ultimate HDTV, keep in mind that in this high tech world where everything is changing fast, getting the latest features does not necessarily imply you will be future-proofing your purchase. At the instant you think you have got the latest, TV makers come with even more appealing specs to make you discard your new product and buy an even newer one!

This is part of the TV makers game. In fact, most often, they do come with features that do not bring any significant improvement to the end picture. Specs such as the latest mega contrast ratios, 240Hz refresh rates in LCDs, and 600Hz sub-field drive in plasma displays, are mainly there to help TV makers impress with their number game BUT the resultant improvement in picture quality is still minimal.

Just take the latest 240Hz refresh rate in LCDs. Both 120Hz and 240Hz are mainly there to eliminate juddered when handling 24p content. Yet the impression that TV makers want to deliver is that 240Hz (and 120Hz) LCDs are faster than 60Hz plasma TVs - when in reality pixel response and video refresh rates are two totally distinct issues. Improved pixel response help reduce blur but the higher refresh rate does not necessarily mean reduced blurring.

You see, 120Hz and 240Hz technologies has nothing to do with blur directly (though the 2msec response time necessary to support 240Hz would eventually help minimize motion blur) and all with judder. However 240Hz per se does not really add much to the end picture result apart from improved motion resolution over 120Hz systems. Still, this improvement would be hard to perceive without the use of test patterns.


My advice is always the same - get the best specs/feature set that you can afford as this often helps lengthen the product life in terms of usability but ensure that the features you get would eventually serve a purpose for you.




Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to 2009 Samsung LED TVs vs. Samsung LCD TVs

 


 

Remember to subscribe to our free e-zine to remain abreast with the latest additions to our website. 

Click here for details.

 

 

 

back to... Home Page