Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

left image

Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

by Joseph
(Malta)

Would appreciate any comments on whether I should go for the Samsung LED UE46B6000 or the Samsung LCD LE46B750.

The dealer is quoting same price for both so I am a bit at a loss as to which one I should go for.

The Editor: We suggest to go through our article 'Samsung LED TVs vs. Samsung LCD TVs - Which is Better?' for a detailed discussion on this issue.

Comments for
Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

Click here to add your own comments

Aug 26, 2010

never buy samsung
by: Anonymous

Google Samsung with pink dots.
They use cheap materials. I bought 3. Trouble with all 3. They will not stand behind their products. Never again.

Winster

Jun 20, 2010

LED way overpriced in my opinion
by: Sergey

I don't know about the long term effects of the LED's (just like some people say that life expectancy of a plasma is horrible because the picture burns into the screen, but i still tell them don't have it on 24/7) I've had a 42" Samsung LCD for over 2 years now, and even though it's a little outdated, my PS3 looks awesome through HDMI cable. I've been to Best Buy about 4 times in past 2 weeks looking for a size upgrade for the living room, and every time I walk in, the ones that pop the most are the LED's and Samsung LCD's. I don't know why, but most of the other brands, compared to Samsung look either blurry or foggy, not giving the true color a HDTV should.

Overall, LEDs have a great picture and all the reduced weight stuff, but I think that they are way overpriced since they are somewhat new to the market. I got my eye on Samsung LN55C630K1F, customer reviews sound promising and the price is pretty awesome in my book, next step is off to BB to check it out for myself.

Anyhow, good luck on purchase, but I'd rather go with LCD!!!

May 31, 2010

RE: LED TVs are overrated but will still have
by: Anonymous

Very useful posts on here. Thanks for taking the time to explain so thoroughly.

May 24, 2010

LED TVs Not Ready
by: Kenny Stainton Houston

I just returned 2 LED TVs because I could not stand the refresh rate after 1 day. Too jerky. Even on close up slow drama dialog, it jerked like Max Headroom. I was really bummed because the picture looked so good but the 120hz refresh is simply poor.

I returned them for plasmas and am happy. When the true refresh rate gets better say 600hz they will be great. Also the largest is 55 in. I exchanged for a 58 in. plasma. Great!!

Don't buy LED TVs. You will probably regret it. The brand doesn't matter.

May 21, 2010

LED TVs are overrated but will still have
by: Anonymous

People should be careful about jumping on the OLED bandwagon - because as it stands (and as it will continue to stand) OLED is not built with image quality in mind.

OLED has it's use, but in the home, for people who want the best PQ, they're not for you and they never will be.

I believe in fact that OLED will make a splash, give manufacturers some instruction sets and design foundations which will be used on/off in their future products, but those products will not actually be built with OLED in mind so to speak. They'll just be influenced by them.

"Slim" is also a bit of a gimmick in the sense that it's trendy, but not entirely necessary. Yes of course if you are wall mounting, or trying to 'align' the screen in some attempt to make your room look modern, then yes it does help. But then again consider that

A) Wall brackets have gotten thinner, but not thin enough that it won't be OBVIOUS that you have a device BEHIND the television. How thin the television is, doesn't hide this fact.
B) People aren't going to notice the depth of your screen, and go 'oh that's not modern!'

Plasma is still the best, and the technology hasn't been abandoned like people would have you believe. In fact Samsung's recent Slim 50PSC7000 is a perfect example of this. It's 2.2cm deep. I don't know about you, but 2.2cm is not thick. I don't need my television (which I buy for image quality) to be THAT thin(3cm).

So what's the big fuss over the LEDs? The LED backlighting?; hardly. The LED aren't even true RGB a lot of them are still white-lit, and they're crap. Additionally, the actual panel technology has not improved. They still use VA, which is sorely outdated now.

The only true stepping stone in televisions, will come when they start implementing true RGB LED.

And then the only true advancement in televisions overall, will come when they can make mass use of LCOS (similar to the Canon XEED projectors).

Both steps will be required. Until then, a lot of this LED hype is just that, hype. The average person does not know nor can they tell the difference.

The only benefit of LED, OLED, and etc. is power consumption and the 'green' factor.
Again - that's irrelevant to image quality.

X Close Editor

May 21, 2010
Rating

Submitted by: Anonymous

Title

Comment
 People should be careful about jumping on the OLED bandwagon - because as it stands (and as it will continue to stand) OLED is not built with image quality in mind. OLED has it's use, but in the home, for people who want the best PQ, they're not for you and they never will be. I believe in fact that OLED will make a splash, give manufacturers some instruction sets and design foundations which will be used on/off in their future products, but those products will not actually be built with OLED in mind so to speak. They'll just be influenced by them. "Slim" is also a bit of a gimmick in the sense that it's trendy, but not entirely necessary. Yes of course if you are wall mounting, or trying to 'align' the screen in some attempt to make your room look modern, then yes it does help. But then again consider that A) Wall brackets have gotten thinner, but not thin enough that it won't be OBVIOUS that you have a device BEHIND the television. How thin the television is, doesn't hide this fact. B) People aren't going to notice the depth of your screen, and go 'oh that's not modern!' Plasma is still the best, and the technology hasn't been abandoned like people would have you believe. In fact Samsung's recent Slim 50PSC7000 is a perfect example of this. It's 2.2cm deep. I don't know about you, but 2.2cm is not thick. I don't need my television (which I buy for image quality) to be THAT thin(3cm). So what's the big fuss over the LEDs? The LED backlighting?; hardly. The LED aren't even true RGB a lot of them are still white-lit, and they're crap. Additionally, the actual panel technology has not improved. They still use VA, which is sorely outdated now. The only true stepping stone in televisions, will come when they start implementing true RGB LED. And then the only true advancement in televisions overall, will come when they can make mass use of LCOS (similar to the Canon XEED projectors). Both steps will be required. Until then, a lot of this LED hype is just that, hype. The average person does not know nor can they tell the difference. The only benefit of LED, OLED, and etc. is power consumption and the 'green' factor. Again - that's irrelevant to image quality.

Cancel Delete Delete & Ban

throbber Updating Comments page...

Apr 20, 2010

samsung LED TV vs LCD TV
by: Paul UK

I've got both the LED and LCD and the LED is by far the best looking and performing.

Apr 12, 2010

Shouldn't buy anything from Samsung
by: Anonymous

The support is absolutely horrid. Took more than six months to resolve a defective unit. I had to write letters to atty general and consumer fraud for my state to get Samsung off their butts! Just read the complaints about most any Samsung products. All the same.

Find another brand that has a history of better service...

Mar 19, 2010

LED's glossy screen
by: Felix

I was thinking of buying a Samsung LED,but when I found that the LED TVs have a glossy glass I purchased an LCD TV, cause I hate seeing myself drinking tea on the display especially when there is a dark picture.

Mar 14, 2010

LCDs and LEDs
by: Mike

Just because a technology is "newer" doesn't make it "better". Remember that more research and development has been carried out on LCDs because they have been around for a while.

The contrast ratio (The depth or richness of colors) is far greater on LED TV's than LCDs. The response times (How fast a pixel changes color) are comparable, but a major problem with OLEDs (Organic LEDs, on true LED T.Vs) is that they fade or dim as they progress through their working lifetime. Due to this technology being "new", these TVs will require further revision to improve the lifetimes and performance characteristics of their display elements.

Therefore, one could wait for technology to improve, whilst the price decreases as is the age old trend of innovative technology. (Expensive and problematic becomes cheaper and reliable over time)

Feb 25, 2010

Samsung LED 6000 series
by: Lou

In January, I bought and love the Samsung UN40B6000 LED/LCD 120 hertz and paid $1199.00 from PowersellersNYC.

Yesterday my son ordered a Samsung UN46B6000 LED/LCD, 120 hertz and paid $1299.00 from Amazon.com. You can't beat those prices for the quality received. The picture is absolutely outstanding for those prices.

Feb 25, 2010

$1200? Yes please
by: Anonymous

Wow I got my LED for gaming, 46" for $1200. Freaking awesome.

Feb 25, 2010

Sony still the best?
by: Mikkel

Mate listen up... Sony might produce a whole lot of TV's, but what they basically are doing is copying features from other manufactures.

Samsung is still, by miles, producing the best LCD panels, stating otherwise is lack of knowledge and ability to see. Sure Sony makes some nice TVs - no doubt about it, but it cant match Samsung. And where is Sony at the LED market? They are evolving with the speed of a snail, and the design looks like something out of a 60' sci-fi. :)

MY advise for you mate is check the TVs out - bring your favorite movie and play a few scenes on both the TVs. LED are sweet TVs, but if you don't have a decent sound system you can plug it into, I say that alone would make me say gogogo LCD.

I have a Samsung F86, and I am 100% satisfied with the LCD screens in general.

Feb 22, 2010

Against Chinese products
by: David

The only reason I will buy a Samsung is because is not made in China. I hate products that are made there. So I try to buy non-Chinese products.

Feb 18, 2010

That's OLED!
by: Anonymous

That's called OLED (organic light emitting diode) and its still being perfected and it was not invented by SONY.

Sure Sony make nice OVERPRICED TVs, but most of us want the same quality for a cheaper price.

Feb 11, 2010

Sony is BEST!
by: Anonymous

Stop the crap about Samsung. Sony is still the best!

Have you heard of the new paper TV. Not really paper but still its flexible. Think of what a new place this would take technology to huh? Now you could roll your TV up and take it out. Isn't that great?

Feb 04, 2010

LED TVs
by: Stan

I would go with the LED. I actually have that TV and it is amazing. You do have a glass screen panel, which causes some glare, but the colors are much richer and has deeper blacks. Plus if you want to wall mount the LED, its as thin as a picture frame if you buy the slim wall mount. They are both good TV's but I would go with the LED, and I have.

Jan 16, 2010

LED vs LCD
by: Lou

I suggest getting the LED---the backlighting uses LED's instead of fluorescent light--dynamic contrast ratio much better and the 120 hertz refresh rate helps even though they aren't transmitting 120 hertz yet, the TV still scans at that rate.

The auto-motion can be set at different rates so you can customize it or turn it off.I replaced my LCD Samsung with the LED/LCD UN40B6000--love it!!!!

Dec 31, 2009

Motion sickness .. appended
by: Bill

In summary, it is a border or line effect shortcoming of the actual digital processing algorithm.

The actual crystals themselves, in the latest sets, are well capable of switching fast enough to keep up with the motion.

Sorry, had to clear up my previous comment in case it caused confusion.

Dec 29, 2009

Motion sickness
by: Bill

Joe.. it's not the "motion" that's the cause of the digital blurring as people move across LCD images. It's the fault of the actual MPEG4 algorithm, which in turn comes from the original JPEG still imaging.

It's why graphics designers, with lots of line drawings, compress into gif and suchlike rather than JPEG, which is best suited for photographic images.

The 'authorities' will have you believe it's a fault of LCD technology, but at 100 Hz plus with modern electronics that's just bull. I'll bet you barely notice the fast motion of a tennis ball, for example, looking blurred on your set.

Blame the actual 'authorities' themselves for rushing digital technology to the consumer too soon in order to get them to shell out before the software was better refined.

You'll see. In a few years with HD-3D and MPEG version 10 all this will be spelt out to the public in order for them to shell out once again.

Dec 23, 2009

These new LED TVs just suck
by: Joe

OK... SEARS suckered me in to buying one of the new Samsung LED TVs. For some reason, I don't know if it's the feed they use some how or what's going on, but in the store, the LED TVs look really good. But after having it home for a while, I started noticing that even with the 120 hz processor.... these TVs can't handle MOTION! As people move across the screen, you see that digital "chicklet" motion around them... that digital blurring, even with Blu Ray DVDs.

It's terrible. I'm so annoyed. I WANT my money back, but I don't think I stand a chance of getting SEARS or Samsung to refund my money and take this 46 inch piece of crap back. They got me. What also sucks is that I'm stuck paying for this thing for quite a while with monthly payments.

The only good thing about the Samsung 46 inch LED TV is its thin size. The speakers suck, but that's to be expected in such a thin TV, but for a TV that's supposed to have such a great picture... it IS great, until people start moving around. I'd rather have a thicker TV if it would get me a better picture that handles motion.

Dec 19, 2009

Government refund on LED LCD TV's
by: K.Vella

Mr J.Vella, who is giving Eur500 back on LED TVs? Is this a government refund?

Nov 24, 2009

LED's the Future
by: Anonymous

LED is newer technology and it takes time to build up with existing LCD's which are far more advanced in their research. But one day or the other they will sure beat up the LCD's

Nov 23, 2009

OLED and inorganic LEDs
by: Jono

See the problem with LCDs is that they use backlights period. Don't be fooled by believing Samsung's "LED" label. It's still an LCD, it just uses an LED as the backlight source. I believe thats right, correct me if I'm wrong.

All the hype around inorganic and organic LED displays (like in the ZuneHD) haven't yet reached sizes 40+ inches for viable mass production. Those are the displays to hold on to you hard-earned cash for. IMO, the "LED" displays that Samsung has now (series 9) are not worth the price difference of their LCD cousins. If you have the patience to wait a few more years, save up for the true organic/inorganic LED displays (OLED).

Oct 07, 2009

Disappointed!
by: Anonymous

I bought the Samsung 46 inch 7100; speakers suck,geek squad said use my surround sound system. I said I paid $2000 I want speakers that work. I don't want to use my surround sound every time I turn my TV on.

The picture sucks on a lot of the channels. I don't know if it's because I am using Comcast or not. Best but won't take the TV back after 30 days, didn't realize that... that also sucks. I did not call in my complaint until 34 days.

Sep 05, 2009

Attn: Joseph from Malta!!
by: J.Vella

Dear Joseph from the little island of Malta...

Always go for the LED version since the local agent is giving away Eur500 for every LED model you buy. Then with the additional eur500 buy your lcd or another LED version to have eur1000 to spend at the shop. Personally I go for the slimmest, brightest, long lasting, less consuming, cheaper model which is the LED version. Thanks

Aug 26, 2009

100,000 hous - Is that enough?
by: Andrew Ghigo

Present day plasma and LCD TVs (both CCFL and LED TVs) have a rated display panel lifetime of approximately 100,000hrs. This does not mean that the electronics inside will last as long since this depends on many factors, including ambient temperature, humidity levels, stability of the mains supply, etc. But in general, you should expect these to give you a few years of trouble free operation - somewhat better than standard CRT TVs.

As to the required maintenance, there is not much except to ensure that the vent ports on the back of the TV are clean and free from being blocked with dust - otherwise the temperature inside the unit will rise above the specified operating temperature - something which may eventually reduce the TV lifetime.

Re. the issue of display setup, this is up to you but in general, you can always adjust the picture to your liking. Just take note however that setting a brighter picture would consume more electricity - so... just do not set the brightness level too much unless you are bound to watch TV under bright lighting.

Aug 20, 2009

I'm considering getting a LED TV
by: Anonymous

I've been looking at the Samsung LED 40 inche series 6. Are they really worth all that money?

I am curious what the life expectancy is compared to all other tv's? LED technology is suppose to last longer while consuming less energy so - how long can I expect an LED tv to last?

And what, if any maintenance will be required? Any calibrations or tune-ups I need to be aware of? I heard plasma only last around 7 years.

thanks, Vinny

Jul 12, 2009

Great info but?
by: Anonymous

After reading all the comments & comparisons which by the way was great info, I still find myself confused as to what to purchase. It appears regardless of what you purchase now, in 6 months it will be outdated by something all new for 2010 models. It's like buying a computer in that regard.

I certainly still need more opinions of both experts and owners of the various newer models.

Thank you... Gary

Jun 30, 2009

Very slim , good quality , high contrast , without blind , high speed piture ...
by: mohsen B M

LED better than LCD and plasm TVs!

Jun 22, 2009

Led is the best
by: Anonymous

In my opinion led is the best since it is a newer technology with capability of more producing control and it is updated technology based on the lcd.

Jun 14, 2009

Very Good Article
by: Anonymous

A very informative article that takes a practical approach to this issue LED TVs vs. LCD TVs.

Thank you.

May 25, 2009

LED TVs vs. Conventional CCFL LCD Tvs
by: Andrew Ghigo

What I am trying to say is that expensive display technology does not always equate to the best in picture performance. This also holds true with respect to latest edge-lit LED TVs released so far by both Sony and Samsung. In fact, in a review published by Cnet of the Samsung 52B750, this CCFL-based LCD HDTV did turn out to be capable of superior overall picture performance than the LED TVs from the same TV maker.

As I tried to explain in a recent review article of the new Samsung LED TVs published at http://www.practical-home-theater-guide.com/samsung-led-tv.html, while edge-lit LED TVs do have their advantageous, yet from a picture perspective their only related benefit - if it can be called so - is their mega dynamic contrast ratio. But as further expressed in out article at http://www.practical-home-theater-guide.com/contrast-ratio.html on contrast ratio ratings, it is not contrast alone that makes the picture.

May 23, 2009

samsung led tv vs Samsung Lcd
by: Varun

Hi Andrew, Nice comments thanks but I didnt clearly understand the last para on backlighting of edge led vs lcd. Are you saying that edge lit led is not that good? I am too contemplating between the: Samsung 7000(100hz) vs 6000(100hz) vs Samsung 40B750(200hz). The led ones are thin, are nice looking but the speed of 40B750 is 200hz because of which I am considering the same. What would be your recommendation? Thanks.

Apr 28, 2009

Samsung LED HDTVs vs CCFL-based LCDs
by: Andrew Ghigo

Unfortunately, many do the mistake of assessing a product on price factor alone.

The Samsung UE46B6000 LED TV represents Samsung entry-level series of LED-based LCD TVs for 2009 while the LE46B750 represents one of Samsung's premium line of CCFL-based HDTVs.

The new LED-based technology is still significantly more expensive than standard LCDs for the same feature set. The fact that these two models are practically selling at the same price tag arise out of the simple reason that the CCFL based model (B750 series) come with a superior feature set. In other words, with the Samsung LED TV, you are enjoying the more expensive LED technology with its benefits - in particular with respect to energy consumption. Instead, with the CCFL-based Samsung LCD TV, you are enjoying a superior feature set; features not available on the Samsung LED TV include the presence of internet connectivity, 200Hz Motion Plus technology, and a built-in content library.

The best way to choose between the two is to look at the full specs sheet and see which features best suit your needs. It is also advisable to see the two sets in person on a side by side comparison to determine which picture you prefer when displaying the same content.

One thing worth taking note here relates to the new Samsung LED TVs. Unlike 2008 models, this new series does not employ local dimming LED technology. The latter did enable Samsung, Sony and LG to come up with HDTVs that did prove to be capable of delivering the very best in picture performance - with black levels that were on par with premium plasmas from Pioneer. This new lineup of Samsung LED TVs do not use local dimming and instead use LEDs as replacement to the CCFL to provide edge lighting of the LCD display panel. It appears that a version with local dimming will be available sometime later this year (Sept. or later).

This does not mean that the new Samsung LED LCD TVs released so far are not capable performers but this may add to the confusion on the many different display technologies as adopted by different TV makers. Either LED technology has its pros and cons. Unlike CCFL, edge-lit LED lighting can be dimmed and therefore these new LED HDTVs can produce deeper blacks than CCFL-based LCD TV sets when handling predominantly dark scenes. At the same time, lack of local dimming means that they cannot produce the same deep black levels as corresponding 2008 sets with mixed brightness scenes. On the other hand, 2008 LED LCD HDTV sets with local dimming did exhibit a sort of a subtle halo effect instead of pure blackness in dark areas adjacent to bright parts of an image due to light spilling over from light to adjacent dark areas in the image.

X Close Editor

Apr 28, 2009
Rating

Submitted by: Andrew Ghigo

Title

Comment
 Unfortunately, many do the mistake of assessing a product on price factor alone. The Samsung UE46B6000 LED TV represents Samsung entry-level series of LED-based LCD TVs for 2009 while the LE46B750 represents one of Samsung's premium line of CCFL-based HDTVs. The new LED-based technology is still significantly more expensive than standard LCDs for the same feature set. The fact that these two models are practically selling at the same price tag arise out of the simple reason that the CCFL based model (B750 series) come with a superior feature set. In other words, with the Samsung LED TV, you are enjoying the more expensive LED technology with its benefits - in particular with respect to energy consumption. Instead, with the CCFL-based Samsung LCD TV, you are enjoying a superior feature set; features not available on the Samsung LED TV include the presence of internet connectivity, 200Hz Motion Plus technology, and a built-in content library. The best way to choose between the two is to look at the full specs sheet and see which features best suit your needs. It is also advisable to see the two sets in person on a side by side comparison to determine which picture you prefer when displaying the same content. One thing worth taking note here relates to the new Samsung LED TVs. Unlike 2008 models, this new series does not employ local dimming LED technology. The latter did enable Samsung, Sony and LG to come up with HDTVs that did prove to be capable of delivering the very best in picture performance - with black levels that were on par with premium plasmas from Pioneer. This new lineup of Samsung LED TVs do not use local dimming and instead use LEDs as replacement to the CCFL to provide edge lighting of the LCD display panel. It appears that a version with local dimming will be available sometime later this year (Sept. or later). This does not mean that the new Samsung LED LCD TVs released so far are not capable performers but this may add to the confusion on the many different display technologies as adopted by different TV makers. Either LED technology has its pros and cons. Unlike CCFL, edge-lit LED lighting can be dimmed and therefore these new LED HDTVs can produce deeper blacks than CCFL-based LCD TV sets when handling predominantly dark scenes. At the same time, lack of local dimming means that they cannot produce the same deep black levels as corresponding 2008 sets with mixed brightness scenes. On the other hand, 2008 LED LCD HDTV sets with local dimming did exhibit a sort of a subtle halo effect instead of pure blackness in dark areas adjacent to bright parts of an image due to light spilling over from light to adjacent dark areas in the image.

Cancel Delete Delete & Ban

throbber Updating Comments page...

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to 2009 Samsung LED TVs vs. Samsung LCD TVs

HDTV Guides

Flat-panel TV Reviews

Projection Systems

Digital and Satellite Television

Home Theater Audio

Wireless Home Theater

Home Theater Guides

Books and Magazines

Home Theater Ideas!

Movie Posters

Shopping Online

Website Information

.

[?] Subscribe To This Site

Please Note:

Double-underline links appearing on this site represent additional information and special deals related to the page content; this added information is being supplied directly by Kontera.

To view this information, please place your cursor over these double-underline links.

Stay tuned to Practical Home Theater Guide

New content will follow soon!

Information on this website represents the author's opinion and does not constitute professional advice; please read our terms of use and privacy policy before using this site.

Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

Comments for Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

Comments for
Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD