Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

HDTV Guides

Flat-panel TV Reviews

Projection Systems

Digital and Satellite Television

Sound and Wireless Systems

Home Theater Guides

Movie Posters

Books and Magazines

Home Theater Ideas!

Find the Best Price
Store
Website Information

-

[?] Subscribe To This Site

Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

by Joseph
(Malta)

Would appreciate any comments on whether I should go for the Samsung LED UE46B6000 or the Samsung LCD LE46B750.

The dealer is quoting same price for both so I am a bit at a loss as to which one I should go for.

The Editor: We suggest to go through our article 'Samsung LED TVs vs. Samsung LCD TVs - Which is Better?' for a detailed discussion on this issue.

Comments for
Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

Average Rating

Click here to add your own comments

Oct 07, 2009
Rating

Disappointed!
by: Anonymous

I bought the Samsung 46 inch 7100; speakers suck,geek squad said use my surround sound system. I said I paid $2000 I want speakers that work. I don't want to use my surround sound every time I turn my TV on.

The picture sucks on a lot of the channels. I don't know if it's because I am using Comcast or not. Best but won't take the TV back after 30 days, didn't realize that... that also sucks. I did not call in my complaint until 34 days.

Sep 05, 2009
Rating

Attn: Joseph from Malta!!
by: J.Vella

Dear Joseph from the little island of Malta...

Always go for the LED version since the local agent is giving away Eur500 for every LED model you buy. Then with the additional eur500 buy your lcd or another LED version to have eur1000 to spend at the shop. Personally I go for the slimmest, brightest, long lasting, less consuming, cheaper model which is the LED version. Thanks

Aug 26, 2009
Rating

100,000 hous - Is that enough?
by: Andrew Ghigo

Present day plasma and LCD TVs (both CCFL and LED TVs) have a rated display panel lifetime of approximately 100,000hrs. This does not mean that the electronics inside will last as long since this depends on many factors, including ambient temperature, humidity levels, stability of the mains supply, etc. But in general, you should expect these to give you a few years of trouble free operation - somewhat better than standard CRT TVs.

As to the required maintenance, there is not much except to ensure that the vent ports on the back of the TV are clean and free from being blocked with dust - otherwise the temperature inside the unit will rise above the specified operating temperature - something which may eventually reduce the TV lifetime.

Re. the issue of display setup, this is up to you but in general, you can always adjust the picture to your liking. Just take note however that setting a brighter picture would consume more electricity - so... just do not set the brightness level too much unless you are bound to watch TV under bright lighting.

Aug 20, 2009
Rating

I'm considering getting a LED TV
by: Anonymous

I've been looking at the Samsung LED 40 inche series 6. Are they really worth all that money?

I am curious what the life expectancy is compared to all other tv's? LED technology is suppose to last longer while consuming less energy so - how long can I expect an LED tv to last?

And what, if any maintenance will be required? Any calibrations or tune-ups I need to be aware of? I heard plasma only last around 7 years.

thanks, Vinny

Jul 12, 2009
Rating

Great info but?
by: Anonymous

After reading all the comments & comparisons which by the way was great info, I still find myself confused as to what to purchase. It appears regardless of what you purchase now, in 6 months it will be outdated by something all new for 2010 models. It's like buying a computer in that regard.

I certainly still need more opinions of both experts and owners of the various newer models.

Thank you... Gary

Jun 30, 2009
Rating

Very slim , good quality , high contrast , without blind , high speed piture ...
by: mohsen B M

LED better than LCD and plasm TVs!

Jun 22, 2009
Rating

Led is the best
by: Anonymous

In my opinion led is the best since it is a newer technology with capability of more producing control and it is updated technology based on the lcd.

Jun 14, 2009
Rating

Very Good Article
by: Anonymous

A very informative article that takes a practical approach to this issue LED TVs vs. LCD TVs.

Thank you.

May 25, 2009
Rating

LED TVs vs. Conventional CCFL LCD Tvs
by: Andrew Ghigo

What I am trying to say is that expensive display technology does not always equate to the best in picture performance. This also holds true with respect to latest edge-lit LED TVs released so far by both Sony and Samsung. In fact, in a review published by Cnet of the Samsung 52B750, this CCFL-based LCD HDTV did turn out to be capable of superior overall picture performance than the LED TVs from the same TV maker.

As I tried to explain in a recent review article of the new Samsung LED TVs published at http://www.practical-home-theater-guide.com/samsung-led-tv.html, while edge-lit LED TVs do have their advantageous, yet from a picture perspective their only related benefit - if it can be called so - is their mega dynamic contrast ratio. But as further expressed in out article at http://www.practical-home-theater-guide.com/contrast-ratio.html on contrast ratio ratings, it is not contrast alone that makes the picture.

May 23, 2009
Rating

samsung led tv vs Samsung Lcd
by: Varun

Hi Andrew, Nice comments thanks but I didnt clearly understand the last para on backlighting of edge led vs lcd. Are you saying that edge lit led is not that good? I am too contemplating between the: Samsung 7000(100hz) vs 6000(100hz) vs Samsung 40B750(200hz). The led ones are thin, are nice looking but the speed of 40B750 is 200hz because of which I am considering the same. What would be your recommendation? Thanks.

Apr 28, 2009
Rating

Samsung LED HDTVs vs CCFL-based LCDs
by: Andrew Ghigo

Unfortunately, many do the mistake of assessing a product on price factor alone.

The Samsung UE46B6000 LED TV represents Samsung entry-level series of LED-based LCD TVs for 2009 while the LE46B750 represents one of Samsung's premium line of CCFL-based HDTVs.

The new LED-based technology is still significantly more expensive than standard LCDs for the same feature set. The fact that these two models are practically selling at the same price tag arise out of the simple reason that the CCFL based model (B750 series) come with a superior feature set. In other words, with the Samsung LED TV, you are enjoying the more expensive LED technology with its benefits - in particular with respect to energy consumption. Instead, with the CCFL-based Samsung LCD TV, you are enjoying a superior feature set; features not available on the Samsung LED TV include the presence of internet connectivity, 200Hz Motion Plus technology, and a built-in content library.

The best way to choose between the two is to look at the full specs sheet and see which features best suit your needs. It is also advisable to see the two sets in person on a side by side comparison to determine which picture you prefer when displaying the same content.

One thing worth taking note here relates to the new Samsung LED TVs. Unlike 2008 models, this new series does not employ local dimming LED technology. The latter did enable Samsung, Sony and LG to come up with HDTVs that did prove to be capable of delivering the very best in picture performance - with black levels that were on par with premium plasmas from Pioneer. This new lineup of Samsung LED TVs do not use local dimming and instead use LEDs as replacement to the CCFL to provide edge lighting of the LCD display panel. It appears that a version with local dimming will be available sometime later this year (Sept. or later).

This does not mean that the new Samsung LED LCD TVs released so far are not capable performers but this may add to the confusion on the many different display technologies as adopted by different TV makers. Either LED technology has its pros and cons. Unlike CCFL, edge-lit LED lighting can be dimmed and therefore these new LED HDTVs can produce deeper blacks than CCFL-based LCD TV sets when handling predominantly dark scenes. At the same time, lack of local dimming means that they cannot produce the same deep black levels as corresponding 2008 sets with mixed brightness scenes. On the other hand, 2008 LED LCD HDTV sets with local dimming did exhibit a sort of a subtle halo effect instead of pure blackness in dark areas adjacent to bright parts of an image due to light spilling over from light to adjacent dark areas in the image.

X Close Editor

Apr 28, 2009
Rating

Submitted by: Andrew Ghigo

Title

Comment
<br>Unfortunately, many do the mistake of assessing a product on price factor alone. The Samsung UE46B6000 LED TV represents Samsung entry-level series of LED-based LCD TVs for 2009 while the LE46B750 represents one of Samsung's premium line of CCFL-based HDTVs. The new LED-based technology is still significantly more expensive than standard LCDs for the same feature set. The fact that these two models are practically selling at the same price tag arise out of the simple reason that the CCFL based model (B750 series) come with a superior feature set. In other words, with the Samsung LED TV, you are enjoying the more expensive LED technology with its benefits - in particular with respect to energy consumption. Instead, with the CCFL-based Samsung LCD TV, you are enjoying a superior feature set; features not available on the Samsung LED TV include the presence of internet connectivity, 200Hz Motion Plus technology, and a built-in content library. The best way to choose between the two is to look at the full specs sheet and see which features best suit your needs. It is also advisable to see the two sets in person on a side by side comparison to determine which picture you prefer when displaying the same content. One thing worth taking note here relates to the new Samsung LED TVs. Unlike 2008 models, this new series does not employ local dimming LED technology. The latter did enable Samsung, Sony and LG to come up with HDTVs that did prove to be capable of delivering the very best in picture performance - with black levels that were on par with premium plasmas from Pioneer. This new lineup of Samsung LED TVs do not use local dimming and instead use LEDs as replacement to the CCFL to provide edge lighting of the LCD display panel. It appears that a version with local dimming will be available sometime later this year (Sept. or later). This does not mean that the new Samsung LED LCD TVs released so far are not capable performers but this may add to the confusion on the many different display technologies as adopted by different TV makers. Either LED technology has its pros and cons. Unlike CCFL, edge-lit LED lighting can be dimmed and therefore these new LED HDTVs can produce deeper blacks than CCFL-based LCD TV sets when handling predominantly dark scenes. At the same time, lack of local dimming means that they cannot produce the same deep black levels as corresponding 2008 sets with mixed brightness scenes. On the other hand, 2008 LED LCD HDTV sets with local dimming did exhibit a sort of a subtle halo effect instead of pure blackness in dark areas adjacent to bright parts of an image due to light spilling over from light to adjacent dark areas in the image. <br><br>

Cancel Delete Delete & Ban

throbber Updating Comments page...

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to 2009 Samsung LED TVs vs. Samsung LCD TVs

Remember to subscribe to our free e-zine to remain abreast with the latest additions to our website.

Click here for details.

back to... Home Page

Information on this website represents the author's opinion and does not constitute professional advice; please read our terms of use and privacy policy before using this site.

Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

Comments for Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD

Comments for
Samsung LED TV vs Samsung LCD